Theophylact of Ohrid

In his own words on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:1

  Since he intends to write regulations to Timothy, he proclaims himself an apostle, so as to make his word worthy of unquestioning acceptance. I shall not be uttering my own words, he says, but those of Him who sent me; see to it, then, that you are obedient. But since the title of apostle was great, lest it should seem that he was boasting, he added: Not of myself, he says, did I seize this, but I have an urgent debt and am fulfilling a command of the Master. The expression "by commandment" is stronger than the expression "called." Although nowhere did the Father give him a commandment, but Christ: "I will send you," it says, "far away to the Gentiles" (Acts 22:21), and again: "you must stand before Caesar" (Acts 27:24), and: "The Holy Spirit said: Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul" (Acts 13:2); but what belongs to the Son and the Spirit belongs, he says, also to the Father. Listen to what follows next. Do you see, the commandment is common to all. Pay attention also to how David speaks of the Father: "the hope of all the ends of the earth" (Ps. 64:6). And the apostle Paul himself says elsewhere: "we hope in the living God" (1 Tim. 4:10). But now the Son is called our hope. Thus, the Father and the Son have all things in common. The apostle fittingly employed these synonyms: "Savior" and "hope." Since a teacher struggles with many difficulties, for all enmity is directed against him, so that when he falls, those under his care may fall all the sooner, as it is said: "strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered" (Zech. 13:7), one must not, he says, lose heart, for we have as Savior not a man, but God Himself and the Father, Who will swiftly deliver us from dangers. Therefore we endure misfortunes, comforting ourselves with these two thoughts — either that we shall soon be delivered from them, or that we nourish within ourselves better hopes,

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:2

  That is, begotten by me through faith. The preposition "in" – εν – means "through," as the apostle also says elsewhere: "I have begotten you in Christ Jesus through the gospel" (1 Cor. 4:15). And praising him, he calls him not only a son, but also a "true" one – true, because Timothy more than others preserves a likeness to him in faith, and because the apostle Paul sincerely loved him. Very wisely he added: "in faith," so as to encourage Timothy all the more toward it. For if from the beginning he showed such faith that he was deemed worthy to be called a son of Paul, and a true son, then all the more must he now clothe himself in it as in full armor, so as not to be troubled or lose heart. To show courageous boldness is a matter of faith. Nowhere in other epistles did the apostle include the word "mercy," but only here. This is because out of great love he asks for more for his son, as if fearing and trembling for him; he gave him instructions even regarding the stomach. Also because teachers have need of especial mercy. Here again is consolation. For if God is our Father, then He cares for us as for children. Consequently, He will both have mercy and give grace, so that we may all be benefited and have peace with our enemies.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:3

  Pay attention to what a meek speech this is, how he spoke to him in the voice not of a teacher, but of a servant. He did not say: I commanded, but: "I asked." So should we treat our own disciples, but with the corrupt and not fully devoted — differently. The Apostle implores him to remain in Ephesus. For the epistle that he sent to the Ephesians was not sufficient: people do not pay as much attention to epistles. However, perhaps this was even before the epistle. It is supposed that it was then that Paul appointed Timothy as bishop. This is probable, for he says the following further on. He did not say: to entreat, but: "to exhort," which is more authoritative and strict. He did not name them by name, so that through exposure he would not make them more shameless. "To teach otherwise" means to introduce other teachings. For among the Jews there were many false apostles, who out of love for glory and from the desire to be called teachers were inclining the faithful to the law of Moses.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:4

  Fables he calls not the law itself, but the observances and false dogmas. They used to enumerate grandfathers and great-grandfathers, hoping thereby to claim for themselves a certain historical glory. He called them "endless" either because they go back to remote times, or because they have no good purpose, or because they lack clarity, are hard to grasp, and are tangled. It is likely that the apostle here also hints at the Greeks, for they have myths and genealogies in which they enumerate their gods. That is, God established such a dispensation so that everything in it would be received by faith, but they introduce inquiries and upset this dispensation of God. Or that God willed to grant us something great and manifested toward us an ineffable dispensation. It is faith that brings about this dispensation of His goodness, and by no means origin. Meanwhile, they were introducing inquiries. How can this be? How shall we believe concerning the future? Inquiry drives out faith. However, why did the Lord say: "Seek, and you shall find" (Matt. 7:7)? And again: "Search the Scriptures" (John 5:39)? The first expression — "seek" — speaks of petition, of intense desire; the second — "search" — means: study the true meaning of the Scriptures, learn them, and cease all further investigation.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:5

  If you, he says, will admonish them not to teach otherwise, you will achieve this, namely love. If you instill love in them, then every corrupt doctrine will find no place among them. Before, when there was no love, there was envy; from envy came love of power; from love of power the desire to teach; and from this, heresies. But now it is not so. He demands sincere love, love not in words, but "from the heart," and a heart that is "pure" and not darkened by hypocrisy — love that is formed from the disposition of the soul and compassion. When robbers love robbers, this comes not from a good conscience but from an evil one, and not from unfeigned faith. Whoever sincerely believes in God will never allow himself to depart from true love, for it embraces all. But a robber kills those passing by. From this you can conclude that whoever does not have love does not have faith either.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:6

  The word ἀστοχήσαντες is used of those who shoot poorly. Therefore here too, he says, skill is needed in order to throw straight and not miss the target. But some have departed from love and faith, and as a result have turned aside to vain talk. And how this happens, he adds the following.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:7

  That is, suffering from love of power and passion for glory. They would not have been such, if they had love and faith. Here he accuses them of knowing neither the purpose of the law nor the time until which it was destined to hold sway. But perhaps they sinned out of ignorance, and therefore do not deserve condemnation? No! Their ignorance arose from love of power and from the fact that they had no love. For, he says, desiring to be lawmakers and teachers of the law, they pay no attention to the truth, so that they themselves are to blame for their ignorance. What then do they affirm? Perhaps about purifications and various other bodily practices observed according to the law.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:8

  That is, if someone not only explains it in words but also fulfills it in deed. For whoever studies the ordinances of the law but does not fulfill them uses the law unlawfully. Or alternatively, the one who is led by it to Christ uses the law lawfully. The law, not having the power to guide or justify, directs the one seeking righteousness to Christ — and this is its purpose: so that the one who prefers Christ to the law uses the law lawfully, that is, as the law itself commands.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:9

  Because he does not wait for the law to teach him what must be done. This he knows, and he does not fear punishment. By the righteous man here understand one who has attained perfection in virtue: one who not out of fear before the law, but for the sake of the good itself hates evil, who becomes wholly virtue and does more than the law requires, considering it unworthy to be guided by that which threatens him with punishment; but living courageously in virtue, rises above everything characteristic of children; just as a physician is useful for one who has wounds and who is sick, but not for one who is healthy, or a bridle is necessary for a restless horse, but not for a calm one. The Apostle enumerates sins by categories in order to make those guilty of exclusively following the law feel ashamed. And such precisely were the Jews. They constantly bowed down to idols, sacrificed their children to gods, attempted to stone Moses, their hands were stained with blood — were they not impious and murderers? You will find in them all the remaining vices as well, if you trace their history. This is precisely why the law was given to them, so that it would restrain these vices. About this he also speaks in another place: the law "was added because of transgressions" (Gal. 3:19). But for the righteous, as those no longer inclined to transgressions, the law is not necessary.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:10

  Although what had been said was sufficient, nevertheless for the sake of completeness the apostle also added in general: "and for everything." From this it becomes clear that such passions gain access from distorted dogmas, for they are all contrary to sound teaching.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:11

  So connect this passage with the words: "contrary to sound doctrine" (1 Tim. 1:10), which is "according to the gospel." And he calls it the gospel of glory for the sake of those who are ashamed of persecutions and the sufferings of Christ, showing that both the sufferings of Christ and persecutions constitute the glory of Christ. Or else the apostle calls the Gospel the gospel of glory because he hints at the future glory. For if, he says, our present state is full of shame, the future one is glorious. And this glory the Gospel proclaims to us, for the entire gospel relates to the future, not to the present time. Or else the apostle speaks here of the service to God, which the Gospel teaches us. Me, and not the false apostles: their gospel is a gospel of dishonor, and not of glory.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:12

  Since he said: "which was committed to my trust" (1 Tim. 1:11), then, lest it seem that he is boasting, he refers everything to God, and says: one must thank Him Who gave me the strength to be able to take upon myself such a burden. Indeed, it was not proper to human strength — to stand against daily dangers threatening death. Such is true humility: but our humility is in words, and not in the depths of the soul. Lest any of the unbelievers should say: if everything belongs to God and nothing is contributed by us, then why did He make Paul such but not Judas? — the apostle, removing this objection, says: God did not simply strengthen me, nor without consideration, but because I proved faithful. He did not even say it that way, but: "He counted me faithful," again concealing his own merits. I do not claim, he says, that I was faithful, but that He counted me as such. How is this evident? From the fact that He appointed me to the ministry. For how would He have appointed me if He had not seen capability in me? This is like how in households stewards give thanks to their masters for the management entrusted to them, which they present as a sign that their masters consider them more worthy of trust than others. And God says of him: "he is My chosen vessel, to proclaim My name" (Acts 9:15). Thus, he was fit not only for preaching, but also to accomplish in deed that for which he was deemed fit — for this he received power from God. For whoever intends to preach the name of Christ, the great name, so as to impress it upon the souls of believers through preaching, has need of no small power. This is accomplished by the one who in all things worthily both thinks, and speaks, and acts regarding it; whoever is not such does not accomplish it. For how can one preach Christ who does not have Christ wholly within himself? Thus, in all things Paul was faithful, and he attributed nothing to himself of what belonged to the Lord; on the contrary, even his own he called God's. "I labored," he says, "more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God" (1 Cor. 15:10), and much else of the same kind.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:13

  See how he, describing his former life, exalts the mercy of God. Even when he speaks of the Jews, who are worthy of every contempt, he ascribes nothing of the sort to them, but about himself he recounts thus: not only, he says, was I myself a blasphemer, and not only did I strengthen evil within myself, but I also persecuted those who wished to live piously, and I did not simply do this, but with particular ferocity. He shows himself worthy of punishment, though the mercy of God extends even to such people. Why then were the other Jews not shown mercy? Because they sinned not out of ignorance, but quite deliberately. For "many," he says, "believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him,... for they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God" (John 12:42–43). And Christ says: "How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another?" (John 5:44). And the Jews themselves said among themselves: "Do you see that you are gaining nothing? The whole world has gone after Him" (John 12:19). They were always driven by the passion for preeminence. And again, they themselves said: "Who can forgive sins but God alone?" (Luke 5:21). Then Jesus immediately performed that which they held to be a sign of divine power. So why then did they not believe? Was it out of ignorance? But perhaps someone will say: where was Paul at that time? — At the feet of Gamaliel, who had nothing in common with the rebellious crowd: he was occupied with his own affairs. How then did Paul afterwards imprison people? He saw that the preaching was spreading, and ultimately zeal for the law drove him to this, whereas the Jews did everything out of love of power. But how is it that Paul, being so learned in the law, did not recognize Christ through Scripture? He condemns himself precisely for this — that he suffered from ignorance which arose from unbelief, for which reason, he says, he was shown mercy.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:14

  Having said much and great things about the love of Christ for mankind, about how He showed mercy to him who was worthy of the most terrible punishment, he now says that He not only granted this, but also deemed him worthy of adoption, made him a brother, a son, a friend, and a co-heir: so abundantly was the grace of His love for mankind revealed. But lest someone say: since everywhere it is grace, therefore there is no free will, the apostle adds: "with faith and love." For faith, he says, I contributed by believing that He can save me; and love I also acquired myself "in Christ Jesus": because the cause of my love for God is Christ, and not the law. By this he shows that love must be joined with faith. For the fulfillment of the commandments depends on love, as the Lord said: "If you love Me, keep My commandments" (Jn. 14:15).

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:15

  Having said above that He had mercy on me, a persecutor, he continues: do not marvel and do not doubt the greatness of the gift. For He came into the world for this very reason, to save all sinners. And so the word is faithful and worthy of acceptance. Because it is impossible not to trust what has been granted; on the contrary, since the goodness of the Giver is infinite, it deserves trust and acceptance. This is also directed against the Jews who were devoted to the law, to show them that without faith it is impossible to be saved. Why then, having said in another place, "as for legalistic righteousness, blameless" (Phil. 3:6), does he now place himself first among sinners? Because before the righteousness in Christ, the righteousness according to the law is now sin, since its time has already passed. While it was its time, it was righteousness, just as at night the moon and a candle are light. But when Christ appeared like the sun, He eclipsed it. Thus, he who makes use of the candle of legalistic righteousness when the sun of Christ's righteousness has shone forth errs and acts foolishly. And in another place the apostle says about this: "what was glorious has come to have no glory" (2 Cor. 3:10).

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:16

  Pay attention to his humility. I was shown mercy, he says, so that none of those who have sinned would despair, but would have full hope of forgiveness, since the greatest of all sinners — Paul — receives salvation. By this the apostle shows that he himself did not deserve forgiveness, but for the sake of the salvation of others was deemed worthy of this lovingkindness of God. He did not simply say: that in me He might show longsuffering, but "all longsuffering," as if saying: having sinned infinitely, I needed "all" mercy, "all" His lovingkindness, and not in part, like those who sinned in part. "As a pattern," he says, that is, as an example, for the comfort and for the forgiveness of all who wish to believe.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:17

  Since the apostle said something very great about the Son, namely, that He saves the despairing, lest anyone think that the Father is deprived of His glory, he also sends up glory to Him. All this is common to the Son as well. For He too is the King of the ages. If He is the Creator of the ages, then how is He not the King, incorruptible, invisible in His Divinity, and the only wise One? He Himself is the wisdom of the Father. The same must be said also of the Spirit. He said "the only wise" not to contrast the Father with the Son and the Spirit; no, but to show that although both angels and men possess wisdom, truly wise is God alone, as the source of wisdom, while all other creatures that possess wisdom become partakers of it. "Honor and glory" not in words only, but also in deeds. Glory and honor rendered in word only shows us to be merely grateful, but that rendered in deed makes us imitators of Him — which is far greater. God requires from us the glorification of Him both in word, so that we may love Him, attend to Him, and obey Him, and through this ourselves receive benefit; just as one who marvels at the glory of sunlight provides benefit to himself, enjoying the light and making use of it in his works, while one who does not make use of it brings harm and deprivation upon himself.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:18

  Since he used the word "charge," and a charge is something commanding, he added: "my son Timothy." For I do not say this to you in a commanding way, but as to a son. He also said: "I commit," in order to explain the strictness of keeping, because what we have is not ours, but God's. Therefore, what He has granted, we must keep. "According to the prophecies previously made concerning you." The calling of teacher and priest, being great, requires a divine indication, so that a worthy person may receive this calling. Therefore in ancient times priests were chosen by prophecy, that is, by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, for prophecy consists precisely in declaring what exists in the present time. So Timothy too was chosen for the priesthood. But since he speaks of many prophecies, he perhaps means both when he first received him into the number of disciples, and when he circumcised him, and when he ordained him — all of this was accomplished with prophecy. Therefore he says: "I commit to you... this charge... according to the prophecies previously made concerning you," that is, looking to those prophecies, and as if being taught by them what you must do, I urge you to walk worthily of them and not put them to shame. What do I command you? That you should wage war in them, that is, that you should not bypass their laws, but as they chose you and for what they chose you, "as a good soldier." For there is also an evil service of a soldier, when someone presents his members as instruments of sin and impurity. The apostle mentioned warfare in order to show that a mighty battle has been raised against all, and especially against the teacher. Therefore one must be vigilant and not show on one's part the slightest weakness.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:19

  Do not think, he says, to be content only with the fact that you have been appointed to the priesthood according to the prophecies, but you must have faith, so as to rightly proclaim the word of truth, and a good conscience, or a blameless life, from which comes a good conscience, so that you may also preside over others beneficially. For just as a general must first be a good soldier, so too a teacher himself must possess that which he requires of his students. Therefore, even though we are teachers, let us learn not to disregard the counsels and instructions of those who are greater than us. By the word "which," he obviously means a good conscience. And rightly so. For if one's life is impure, then from this proceed also perverse doctrines. In order not to be tormented by fear of the future, those living impiously convince themselves that everything we hold is false. And he who has deviated from the faith and reasons about everything suffers shipwreck, despite the nearness of faith. For faith is a calm harbor; it keeps the mind at rest, while investigations are waves that here and there, as in a shipwreck, quickly seize the mind and dash it against the rocks, or even drown it.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 1:20

  Do you see that even in those times there were people who taught perversely, who departed from the faith, and gave themselves over to investigations and speculations? Therefore do not lose heart now when you see such people, but stand against them. Teaching others, how is it that Satan does not teach himself? However, the apostle did not say: that he might teach them not to blaspheme, but: "that they might learn" (ῐνα παιδευθῶσιν). He does not accomplish this, but it happens as a consequence of his actions. For just as executioners, being themselves notorious criminals, bring others to their senses, so also does the devil. But why did Paul himself not punish them, as he punished Bar-Jesus and as Peter punished Ananias? So that together with the severity of the punishment he might combine greater dishonor, so that he might show that he commands even Satan and through this be more fearsome. Or rather, the apostles themselves punished unbelievers so that they might know that they could not hide. For Ananias too was an unbeliever and still testing. Meanwhile, those who already knew this and then fell away from the faith, they delivered over to Satan, showing them that they were guarded not by their own power but by the care of the apostles. Or furthermore, those whom they wished to correct they did not punish themselves, but the incorrigible they themselves subjected to punishment. How then was the guilty one delivered to Satan? He was cast out of the common assembly, separated from the flock, and handed over naked to the wolf. For just as in ancient times the cloud surrounded the tabernacle, so also the Holy Spirit surrounds the Church of Christ. Consequently, whoever is outside the Church is also outside the Spirit and is therefore pitiable and easily captured. Such is the punishment of excommunication. And God Himself, delivering sinners over to sicknesses and calamities, teaches through this. "But when we are judged," he says, "we are chastened by the Lord" (1 Cor. 11:32). Do you see that to investigate divine things by means of reasoning is to blaspheme? It is an insult to divine things when someone thinks that they are comprehensible by human reasoning.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:1-2

  "First of all," that is, at the daily divine service. The priest, as the common father of the whole universe, cares for all, just as God, to Whose service he is consecrated, watches over all. Notice the far-reaching grace. Jewish prayers are not like this. He did not say immediately "for kings," lest he appear to be a flatterer, but first says "for all people," and only then adds "for kings," even if the kings were unbelievers — one must pray for them because at that time they were all such. From the fact that we pray for all, a twofold good results: on the one hand, through this the hatred that we harbor toward certain people is destroyed, because no one can harbor hostile feelings toward one for whom he offers prayer; on the other hand, they too become better, because with the assistance of prayer they cease their malice and hardness against us. For it is of great significance for those who persecuted and killed, when they hear that those they tormented pray for them. "Prayers, supplications, intercessions" — as words of the same meaning, they are gathered by the apostle to arouse the energy of prayer and to express, by insisting through these expressions on one thing, the demand to act without delay as he commands. However, some have been curious to find a distinction in these expressions as well, asserting that "prayer" means a petition for deliverance from what is grievous; "intercession" means a request for blessings; "supplication" means a cry with a complaint against the ungodly, the injurious, and the incorrigible. See how we are urged to give thanks even for those blessings that are sent to others — for example, that He "makes His sun rise on the evil and the good" (Matt. 5:45) and bestows His blessings abundantly on all, on unbelievers and blasphemers alike. Through this we are most closely united in brotherly love. For whoever thanks God for the blessings given to his neighbor is also obliged to love him. All the more, therefore, must we give thanks for the blessings bestowed upon ourselves.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:2

  Since it was likely that the soul of a Christian was troubled by the fact that during the performance of the sacraments it was commanded to pray for unbelieving rulers, the apostle also presents the advantage, so as to at least in this way incline them to accept the exhortation. Their salvation, he says, brings us tranquility: they wage war so that we may be safe. So then, would it be at all reasonable if they expose themselves to dangers for the sake of our safety, while we are unwilling even to open our lips to pray for them? The apostle added these words because for many a peaceful life, undisturbed by wars, serves as an occasion for nothing but pleasures and mutual displeasures, from which false doctrines are also born. "That we may lead a life," he says, not in pleasures and mutual offenses, but "in all godliness": in "all" — not only in the purest right belief, free from all heresies, but also in a life according to faith; for there is an ungodliness manifested by one's life as well, of which it is said: "they profess that they know God, but in works they deny Him" (Tit. 1:16). Likewise, "that we may lead a life in all purity" means: to live not only in abstinence from deeds of fleshly lust, but also in every virtue. Thus, when we enjoy outward peace, we must have peace in the soul, living in godliness and purity; for in such a case we will indeed live a truly peaceful and tranquil life. There are three kinds of wars that disturb peace: from barbarians, from those who plot against us and live in the same place with us, and from the passions that rise up against us from within. The war from barbarians is ended by the vigilance and courage of rulers, whom we too must assist with our prayers; the war that comes from those who hate us is to be quelled by gentle yielding and prayers, as the prophet David gave an example, saying: "with those who hate peace I was peaceful" (Ps. 120:6–7), and: "they war against me, but I pray" (Ps. 109:4) — and the war that rises up within us ourselves is to be quelled by all the weapons of righteousness.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:3

  Prayer for all, both unbelievers and heretics, is what the word "this" points to. This is also "good" by nature, because we are all of one and the same nature, and it is also "pleasing" to God.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:4

  If He wants all people to be saved, desire this yourself too, and imitate God; and if you desire this, then pray. But if He Himself wants it, then what need, you will ask, is there for prayer on my part? This brings them much benefit, for it disposes them to love, does not allow you to become hardened, and very likely draws them back again to the faith. Know that salvation comes from faith. "And came to the knowledge of the truth," that is, faith in Him; for this is the only truth.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:5

  Having said that God wants all to be saved, he confirms this by saying that it is precisely for this reason that He sent His Son as mediator, so that He might reconcile Him with mankind. Why, then, are not all saved? Because they do not want to be. And having said "one God," he says this not in contrast to the Son, but to idols. That the Son is God is clear from the fact that He is the mediator, since a mediator must partake of both sides between which He mediates. Therefore, since the Son is the mediator between God and men, He belongs to both sides, being God and man — one in two natures. Not God only, because He would not have been accepted by those for whom He was to be the mediator. And not man only, because He needed to converse with God. He did not speak explicitly about the divinity of Christ because polytheism prevailed at that time, lest they think that he too was introducing many gods. Even when "one" and "one" are said, one must not combine these words and say "two," but rather "one" and "one" — such is the caution of Scripture. For this reason he did not even mention the Spirit, so as not to appear a polytheist.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:6

  And for the Gentiles. Truly He died for all — will you then not agree to pray for them? Pay attention to the expression: "who gave Himself." This is against the Arians, who said that He was given up against His will. What does "ransom" mean? Creation was bound to perish, but He gave Himself for it. That is, through the witness the Son became a redemption. Or, explaining this, the apostle now says: by redemption I mean the witness, that is, His suffering. For He came to witness to the truth even unto death. He revealed the Father, the true teaching, and He Himself led a truly angelic life.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:7

  To this testimony I have been appointed a preacher, to preach about it, that is, about the cross and death of Christ. And I was appointed not simply a preacher, to preach in one particular place, but also an apostle, to go everywhere with the preaching. Truly, great is the title of apostle, and therefore he calls himself such. The Apostle affirms the trustworthiness of his words. Since the other apostles did not show zeal for this, partly because they feared the Gentiles, partly because they despised them, I, he says, was truly chosen to be a teacher of the Gentiles. If, therefore, the Son of God died for the Gentiles, and I am their teacher, then you cannot refuse to pray for them. Look, again — "in faith." Not in syllogisms, he says, or logical proofs, but in faith. Then, lest you think that there is deception in this, he added: "in... truth." For what is taught and learned in faith is not a lie; on the contrary, it is taught in truth.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:8

  But how does Christ forbid praying in every place? Does He advise against doing this in public squares, and command entering a room for prayer (Matt. 6:6)? No, Christ does not forbid praying in every place, but teaches not to do so out of vainglory, for show. He mentioned only the room, just as in the saying "let not your left hand know what your right hand does" (Matt. 6:3), He speaks not of hands, but points to the exceeding importance of giving alms without vainglory. Therefore Paul also desires that men pray in every place, since Christ did not forbid this. And he said this in contrast to the Jewish manner of prayer. For prayer among them was performed in one place, that is, in the Temple of Jerusalem. But with us it is not so: grace is boundless, and just as a Christian prays for all, so also in every place. One ought not to deliberate with all carefulness about the place of prayer, but about the manner of it. For he requires hands clean from covetousness, robbery, murders, and wounds — hands full of almsgiving. That is, without bearing grudges or harboring hostility against one's brother. The Apostle teaches that the one who prays should pray without doubt or wavering in his thoughts as to whether or not he will receive what he asks. How then does this happen? He answers: if you ask nothing contrary to His will—nothing unworthy of the King—but ask for everything spiritual, with pure hands and without anger.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:9

  I wish, he says, that women too would lift up pure hands without wrath and deliberation, hands not defiled by robbery and greed. For when a wife compels her husband to procure for her precious stones and gold ornaments, and he steals from others, then she too, of course, is stealing. From women the apostle requires something greater, namely: to dress themselves properly, not elaborately; because the latter is considered indecent. By adornment he means such clothing as covers and conceals on all sides, and does not shamelessly expose. For he adds: "with modesty and self-control." For you are going to pray, not to dance. Why then do you contrive braiding of the hair on your head, curling locks, hanging precious stones here, surrounding yourself with them on all sides there, and attaching still others to your shoes — what is this if not the utmost disgrace? And is this not through the tears of the poor, of widows and orphans? You deprive the widow of poor, simple clothing in order to trample pearls underfoot! Is not the longsuffering of God already great enough? You went with the intention of asking for the forgiveness of sins, yet you adorn yourself as though you were going out on stage! Fine indeed is the contrition of heart, and God will undoubtedly hear you, drenched as you are in the tears of the poor. But if Paul forbids even that which merely serves as a sign of wealth, how much more that which pertains to excessive vanity — such as, for example, the rouging of cheeks, the painting of eyes, an affected voice, a languishing gaze, and the rest.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:10

  For you are going to pray, not to dance. Why then do you contrive braiding of the hair on your head, curling locks, hanging precious stones here, surrounding yourself with them on all sides there, and attaching still others to your shoes — what is this if not the utmost disgrace? And is not this through the tears of the poor, of widows and orphans? You deprive the widow of poor, simple clothing in order to trample pearls underfoot! Is not the longsuffering of God already great enough? You went with the intention of asking for the forgiveness of sins, yet you adorn yourself as though you were going out on stage! Fine indeed is the contrition of heart, and God will undoubtedly hear you, drenched as you are in the tears of the poor. But if Paul forbids even that which merely serves as a sign of wealth, how much more that which pertains to excessive vanity — such as, for example, the rouging of cheeks, the painting of eyes, an affected voice, a languishing gaze, and the rest.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:11

  A woman must maintain propriety not only in her appearance and clothing, but also in her voice. According to him, she must not speak even about spiritual matters, but should only learn. It will be better for her if she keeps silence.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:12

  The Apostle takes away from woman every occasion for speaking in church. For after he commanded them to be silent, so that they would not speak under the plausible pretext of teaching, he said: let them not teach; because this would give them authority and preeminence over the husband. Meanwhile, the wife is commanded to be in submission. "Your desire shall be for your husband," it is said (Gen. 3:16). Thus it is fitting for her to keep silence. Through silence she will best show her submission. Know, however, that the Apostle does not forbid women to teach in general, but only in church; outside the church this is not forbidden to her. Thus Priscilla instructed Apollos with sound teaching; thus a believing wife is not forbidden to instruct an unbelieving husband.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:13

  Since, he says, in the very creation the male sex was honored with primacy, and Eve was created second, then after this all wives must hold secondary places after their husbands and be subject to them. For the force of what was then done with regard to Adam and Eve extends to the entire male and female sex.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:14

  Why does the apostle say that Adam was not deceived? Because Scripture does not say this either; on the contrary, the woman said, "the serpent beguiled me" (Gen. 3:13), but Adam does not say, "the woman deceived me," but rather, "she gave to me" (Gen. 3:12). It is not the same thing to be beguiled by a beast—a servant and subordinate. Therefore the latter is properly deception. So in comparison with the woman, the apostle says of Adam that he was not deceived. Adam did not even see "that the tree was good for food" (Gen. 3:6), but the woman saw and was deceived, and then gave also to her husband. Thus she was carried away by passion, while he yielded to his wife. So the apostle says: the woman taught once, and overturned everything; therefore let not this sex teach, for it is fickle, easily impressionable, easily beguiled. Notice, the apostle did not say, "Eve was deceived," but "the woman," meaning by this name the female nature. Just as through Adam all nature became mortal, so also through Eve fickleness passed to all women; and on account of this fickleness the transgression took place first in Eve herself.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 2:15

  Who? Eve? No, but woman, that is, the female sex. Do not despair, he says, O women: God has given you a means of salvation — childbearing, that is, the good upbringing of those born; for one must not only give birth, but also raise them. And this is true childbearing, otherwise it is not childbearing but child-corruption. So then, what about virgins? What about widows? Have they utterly perished? No, the apostle does not say that they will not be saved by their own virtue, but that the upbringing of children contributes to the salvation of wives. A virtuous wife will raise her children in virtue as well. The virtue inherent in her passes through upbringing into her children also. Consequently, a virtuous virgin is undoubtedly saved as well. It seems to me that the apostle, having forbidden wives above from teaching in church, now gives them as consolation someone to teach. If you truly want to teach — teach your own children. Some, however, for reasons unknown, understood childbearing as referring to the birth that was from the Most Holy Theotokos. She, they say, having given birth to the Savior, saved women. But such an understanding is inconsistent with the speech that follows after this. For listen. That is, children, if they preserve the holy faith and dogmas. That is, they will remain in a righteous life. For faith is not sufficient: the beginning and source of a righteous life is love. By "holiness" the apostle means purity of the body. But since not all are virgins, he added: "with modesty." For modesty is not denied to those who live in lawful marriage. Or he simply calls purity modesty. But what if a wicked mother raises her children well? This, although unlikely, if it happens, she will receive a reward for them. But what if a good mother raises her children poorly? If she was negligent and indulged them, she will share the fate of Eli. But if, despite all her care and suffering, she could not make them better — which happens rarely — she will still receive a reward for her labors, since even the Son of God, despite all His works and teaching, had few, however, who believed.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:1

  Since it was doubtful whether mothers could reap the fruits of the virtue of their children, the apostle says: "faithful is the word," that is, what has been said is not false, and let no one doubt. The instruction prescribed to Timothy concerning the bishop applies to bishops of the entire world. If anyone, he says, seeks the episcopate, I do not hinder him, for he desires a good work. But let him seek not merely authority and power, for Moses too desired the work, not the authority: he defended the one unjustly wronged and punished the wrongdoer. The episcopate is so called because it involves oversight over all.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:2

  That is, to be adorned with all virtues, so that neither he himself nor others would reproach him. Therefore, if anyone is conscious of sins in himself, let him not seek such a rank, from which he has removed himself by his own conduct. For a leader must be a lamp, so that all, looking upon him, may be enlightened and guided by his life. If a man bound by the ties of marriage cares about worldly affairs, and a bishop must not care about worldly things, then how does the apostle say, "husband of one wife"? Some suppose that he indicated the celibacy of a bishop. But if this is not what should be understood here, then it means that, having a wife, he can live as though not having one, that is, not submitting to her desires. In saying this, the apostle does not legislate that a bishop must necessarily be married. For how could he who said, "I wish that all men were as I myself am" (1 Cor. 7:7), command this? But if, according to the circumstances of that time, he says, this did happen, then let him be the husband of one wife. This was said also on account of the Jews, among whom polygamy was permitted. Some, however, without any basis supposed that the apostle says this with reference to the church — namely, they say, that a bishop should not transfer from one church to another, because this is adultery. That is, to be cautious, always vigilant, attentively observant, so as to see everything and always be ready for every needful task. That is, to act in all things prudently. That is, beautifully honorable. For if he is kind, hospitable, and merciful only to the local residents, he is partial. But he ought to be even more generous to strangers, for this more clearly testifies to his love of the brethren. The qualities indicated before this are required also of subordinates, but most of all they should belong to the bishop.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:3

  The apostle is not speaking here about one who is drunk with wine, but about one who is quarrelsome and arrogant. Here the discussion is not about those who strike with their hands, but about those who unseasonably disturb the conscience of the brethren. He teaches how one can be neither a drunkard nor a striker. Whoever is gentle will not be quarrelsome. Since he said above that he must be "given to hospitality" (1 Tim. 3:3), he now adds: "not covetous," showing that he will be hospitable if he is not covetous, and at the same time teaching that under the pretext of hospitality he must not accumulate treasures.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:4

  One who manages his own household well can quickly become a good ruler of the state — this is something even secular writers affirm. In his own house he must show an example, for who will believe that a man who could not keep his own son in submission will subdue a stranger to himself? How will he make strangers honorable, when he has allowed his own kin to live dishonorably? "With all dignity" means both in word, and in deed, and in dress — and moreover before all people and at all times.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:5

  A household is nothing other than a small church. Therefore, if he cannot be a good ruler of what is not great, and is easily defined, and easily known, then how can he govern the characters and thoughts — unimaginable — of so many souls? Worthy of attention is the question of why the apostle, while making such demands of laypeople: "Put to death your earthly members" (Col. 3:5), and again: "Those who are Christ's have crucified the flesh" (Gal. 5:24), now demands less of the bishop, not befitting so high a rank, namely: not to be a drunkard, not a striker, and so on. And Christ, commanding to take up one's cross, says: "The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep" (John 10:11). Therefore Paul ought to have demanded of the bishop that he lead a nearly angelic life, free from passions, befitting the loftiness of his station. Listen: with such strictness in manner of life, few people could be found, yet many bishops were needed who would preside in every city. Therefore the apostle also demanded a moderate virtue, which could be found in many. But now, alas! How far we bishops have fallen, so that not even a shadow of such moderate virtue is found in us! Have mercy on us, O Lord!

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:6

  The Apostle speaks here not of one who was young in age, as Timothy was young, which we learn from Paul's words: "let no one despise your youth" (1 Tim. 4:12), but of a recent convert. For, he says, "I planted" (1 Cor. 3:6). Since many of the pagans were converting and being baptized, do not, he says, immediately elevate the newly baptized to such authority. If anyone, before being a proper disciple, becomes a teacher, he will, he says, become puffed up and fall under the same condemnation and punishment to which the devil is subject for his pride.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:7

  That is, from the pagans, so that they too would not reproach him for anything, but on the contrary, would respect him. But what if he appears good to them, yet in reality is not so? This will present a great difficulty. For enemies reproach righteous people. However, the apostle sets forth not this alone, but together with the other virtues, saying: "he must also have a good testimony." But what if they speak ill of him without cause, in order to slander him? This cannot be, because even they respect a man of blameless life. They reproach his teaching, not his life, just as they did not call the apostles fornicators and impious men, but deceivers, which pertained to the preaching alone. But if such a case should arise that a man is falsely slandered, he still must not be appointed bishop. For it must not be that anyone's soul should not be illumined by its lamp. "Let your works shine," He says, "so that people may see" (Matt. 5:16). And if one must have testimony from enemies, then all the more so from friends. He has in mind the reproach from the pagans, which can cut short the beneficial effect of preaching. Either that they will soon put him to death, or that he will fall into the very same sins as they. And to be a stumbling block for many is also a snare of the devil.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:8

  Why then did the apostle omit the presbyters? Because everything he said about bishops applies to the presbyters as well. Indeed, they too have received the right of teaching and leadership in the Church, and yield to bishops only in the right to perform ordination. So then, he says, deacons likewise, that is, must have the same qualities, namely: be hospitable, gentle, not quarrelsome, and so forth. They must, he says, besides what has been said, also have honor. That is, not crafty, not cunning, not holding one thing in mind while saying another — one thing to some, and another to others. He did not say "not drunkards," because that is already extremely base, but "not given to much wine." For some, although they do not get drunk, nevertheless drink a great deal and weaken the disposition of the soul. The ancients, when entering the sanctuary, completely abstained from the use of wine. "Greedy for gain" refers to one who refuses no profit, no matter where it comes from. Understand "not greedy for gain" here as meaning incorruptible and not covetous.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:9

  That is, with the keeping of the right dogma, having also a blameless life. For a pure conscience comes with a blameless life.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:10

  Just as, he says, regarding the bishop I required that he not be a recent convert, so I require that these also not be admitted to the ministry without having been tested, but only after having been sufficiently tested and found to be blameless—just as no one would entrust a newly purchased slave with any managerial position before he has proven himself worthy of it over time.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:11

  The apostle speaks not of some random women, but of deaconesses. For this ministry is very necessary and beneficial for the Church. If he were not speaking of them, what need would there be to speak of women in the midst of a discourse about male deacons? That is, not slanderers who, as is typical of old women, go from house to house and whisper about one another behind their backs. That is, to be vigilant. Since this kind is fickle and easily deceived, they must not, he says, be drowsy, but be alert and watchful. That is, be steadfast both in word and in deeds.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:12

  Do you see that the apostle requires from deacons the very same virtue that he required from bishops? For they too must equally be pure and blameless. He speaks everywhere about the management of children, so that others may not have occasion for scandal.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:13

  "Degree," that is, advancement. For those who showed themselves sober-minded in the lower offices soon attain the higher ones as well, so as to have great boldness in the faith; that is, to be more glorious not in worldly dignities, not in wealth, but in the faith, that is, in all words and deeds according to the faith. Thus those who served well as deacons were afterward glorious also in the degrees of the presbyterate and the episcopate.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:14-15

  Lest by giving him instruction concerning such matters he cast the disciple into grief, as though Paul would no longer see him, he says: I do not write this because I will no longer come; on the contrary, I will come. However, if it happens that I am delayed, you must have a model of how it is fitting for you to live. The apostle said beautifully: "hoping." Since, being led by the Spirit, he did not know where he must go, he rightly has doubts also concerning his coming to Timothy.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:15

  Do not say that people assembled the Church. She is the work of God — the living and fearsome God, not a dead and powerless one, such as are the gods of the Greeks. The Apostle here compares the Church with the Jewish temple and says that the latter was truly a type and shadow, such as, for example, the bells, the costly ornaments, and the high priest with the sacrifices. But the Church is the pillar of truth. For everything performed in her is true and not figurative, as were the things in the church under the Law: instead of bells, she has resplendent preaching; instead of costly ornaments and sacred vestments, a most glorious life, rich in inward fruits; her High Priest is the Son of God; her great sacrifice is His Divine Body.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 3:16

  The economy of our salvation is a mystery. This mystery is "great," a mystery "of godliness," for it is beyond all doubt. But what kind of mystery is it that everyone knows? Very many know it, but not all. And even if all know it now, not all knew it before. Moreover, all know that God became incarnate, but how He became incarnate—this is hidden, and therefore it is a mystery. Consider, then, how great is God's love toward us, if He has fully revealed His mystery to us. Since Paul, in giving instruction about priests, said nothing of the sort that is found in the book of Leviticus — therefore, he says, let no one be surprised if I do not discuss such unimportant matters. What is great is ours, and there is nothing of that sort there. Here God was manifested. In what way? In the flesh; for in His Divinity He is invisible. Either He means that, having done everything for the salvation of men, although He did not persuade some of the obstinate, He nevertheless justified Himself as one who had fulfilled His task; or that He committed no sin, "and no deceit was found in His mouth" (Isa. 53:9). And the righteous under the law were in bondage in spirit. For the law contained threats and punishments but did not possess the spirit of adoption. But the Lord fulfilled all righteousness in the Holy Spirit, being consubstantial with Him and having Him in Himself by nature, and through Himself granting to us also the ability to be justified through Him. For the righteous according to the Gospel, being spiritual, far surpass those who were once justified under the law. O mystery! Together with us, the angels too saw the Son of God, not having seen Him before. For the Gospel says: "and... angels came and ministered unto Him" (Matt. 4:11). And not here only, but from His very birth until His ascension they ministered to Him. At the time of His birth, angels sing a hymn to Him and bring glad tidings of Him to the shepherds; and at the time of His ascension they minister to Him. "Preached among the nations" who were in despair and delusion, and not only "preached," but also "believed on in the world," which serves as a great sign of the power of the One preached and of the truth of the preaching. That is, on clouds, when angels also ministered to Him. Of course, He ascended into heaven not like Elijah, as though into heaven, lest one say that the ascension itself is also glory.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:1

  That is, obviously, clearly, and not covertly, as the law and the prophets. Since the apostle said above that some had suffered shipwreck in the faith, do not be surprised, he says, that now some hold to Jewish errors. A time will come when those who consider themselves Christians will do works even worse. The apostle says this not about the Jews, for they existed in ancient times, as also in that time, but about the Marcionites, Encratites, Manichaeans, and all their assemblies of that sort. For, attending to these things, they condemned certain foods and marriage. However, the apostle has in mind here all other heresies as well, for they are all from the seduction of lying spirits and the teaching of demons. Yet he does not clearly mention all heresies here, so as not to sow them in the souls of people: he points to the heresy that had already begun, namely concerning foods and marriage.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:2-3

  That is, what they speak falsely about, they do not speak falsely out of ignorance, but knowing that it is false, they hypocritically teach it as though it were true.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:3

  That is, since they knew much that was impure about themselves, their conscience bore the branded marks of their impure life, and therefore condemned marriage. For if their life had truly been pure, their conscience too would have been pure and would not have condemned what God had blessed. Just as an ailing stomach condemns food, while it itself has bad digestive juices within. So then what? Do we forbid entering into marriage? By no means. But those who do not wish to enter into marriage we direct toward the keeping of virginity, teaching that it is more honorable; but from this it does not follow that marriage is already dishonorable, just as from the fact that gold is more honorable, it does not follow that it is more honorable than something honorable, and the better is better than the good, not the bad. Therefore, let the one who is able take up the gold of virginity; and the one who cannot, let him accept the silver of marriage. What then? Did not God create foods even for unbelievers? Yes, but they abstain from them. So what then? Is indulgence not forbidden? Very much so, but not the eating of food. For eating observes moderation, while indulgence knows no measure. However, even the indulgence in food is not unclean in itself, but because it weakens the soul of those who give themselves over to it. "And those who have known the truth." Everything pertaining to the Jews was a type, but now truth reigns. Many things were forbidden to the Jews (Lev. 11 ff.), not as unclean, but in order to root out indulgence—so that they, being placed in a constrained position by the many prohibitions, would slaughter bulls and sheep and in this way come to know what kind of gods the Egyptians had invented for themselves. So by "truth" understand either faith in Christ, or simply that truth of which he will presently speak.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:4-5

  For "all things," it says, "were very good" (Gen. 1:31). By saying "creature of God," the apostle designated everything that can be used for food, and in this way already overthrew the error of those who introduce uncreated matter and say that everything came from it. If something is sanctified, does this not mean that it is unclean? No, the apostle makes a qualification. First he essentially says that nothing is unclean, then with a qualification: suppose, he says, that there is something unclean, but you have a remedy: make the sign of the cross over it, give thanks, render glory to God — and the uncleanness disappears. For thanksgiving purifies all things; but the ungrateful person is himself unclean and defiled. Can we then in this way also purify food offered to idols? Yes, if we do not know that it is food offered to idols. But if we know and partake of it, then we are unclean, because we have violated the law commanding us not to partake in the table of demons. Consequently, it is your free will that is defiled by disobedience, while food by its nature is never unclean.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:6

  "These things" – what exactly? That there is a "great... mystery" (1 Tim. 3:16), that to abstain in such a way from marriage and foods is a matter of demons, and the rest of what the apostle said above. And what does "putting in remembrance" mean? The same as "advising." He did not say: commanding, for here he nowhere displays his authority. He said: propose these things to others. Now he says: but you yourself also be "nourished" by the same truths, turning them over in your mind and, as it were, digesting them. For suggesting unceasing attention to them, he said: "nourished." Just as we partake of food every day, so too must we always be nourished by the words of faith.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:7

  That is, remind your own people of what I said, but do not enter into disputes with the corrupted; for it is impossible to benefit them, except perhaps in the case when a scandal might arise, as though out of our weakness we are declining to contend with them. The apostle calls the Jewish observances "fables," either because they are fabricated, or because they are untimely. For imagine if a man of about thirty years clung to the breast — how worthy of ridicule he would be for his untimeliness! He calls them "old wives' tales" because they are already outdated. Profane and unclean — because they constitute an obstacle to faith. For to subject to fear a soul that has risen above all this is characteristic of unclean rules. Train yourself in pure faith and righteous living, for in this consists godliness. Therefore, one must exercise and labor constantly; for he who trains in bodily gymnastics strives in this to the point of sweat even without any competition.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:8

  Some suppose that by fasting he means bodily exercise. This is not true: fasting is a spiritual exercise. But by bodily exercise he means that which, although it requires great labors, nevertheless brings little profit, and only for a time. Here, he says, piety helps a person. For one whose conscience convicts him of nothing bad both rejoices in spirit here, having sure promises of future blessings, and there will live the true life in very deed. Through comparison the apostle shows the superiority of piety.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:9

  That is, this saying is true and worthy of being accepted by all as undoubted. And what is this saying? That godliness is profitable both here and there. Everywhere in the epistle the apostle points this out, having no need to confirm it, but simply proclaiming it, for the word was addressed to Timothy.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy

• 1 Timothy 4:10

  He shows what the godliness is in which the apostles themselves were exercised, and confirms how he has hope for the future life, saying: "for this reason," instead of: therefore "we both labor and suffer reproach." For why would we exhaust ourselves if we did not expect the future blessings that the living God will give us after death? Here the soldiers of an earthly king, having endured many labors and dangers, often do not receive their due reward when the king happens to die; but our King is always alive, and will always repay. That is, He wants to save all—both here and there. But He applies greater care here for the faithful. If He were not their Savior, how would they have stood against all attacks? By this the apostle urges Timothy to endure dangers. Do not lose heart, he says, having such a God, and do not ask for help from others, but hope in Him: God is living and He is the Savior.

  Commentary on 1 Timothy