Theodore of Mopsuestia

In his own words on Hebrews

• Hebrews 1:2

  "Through whom also he made the ages." An age is not a nature that is able to exist in substance but is understood to be a certain interval. This interval can be perceived from its having a beginning of existence until its end or until some other age has likewise taken its beginning.… The "creator of the ages" means nothing different than "everlasting, existing beyond every age, having his own limitless existence." For the maker exists before the things which are made, but an interval of time must be perceived by its having a beginning.… When blessed David says, "Who exists before the ages," he does not wish this to say that God exists before the latter ages, but that God has eternal existence, being earlier than every interval of time. When Paul says, "through whom God also made the ages," Paul does not wish God to be the creator of the later ages but to be eternal and the cause of all ages that have a beginning.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.2-3

• Hebrews 1:2

  He does not say, "God spoke to us in the Son" but simply "in a Son." By saying this and making no separation, he was able to signify both in a single expression. First of all, he signifies the true Son, and by true Son I mean the one who possesses sonship by his natural birth. In the second place, he also includes in this designation the one who shares truly in the dignity of sonship because of his union with God.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 12.1

• Hebrews 1:3

  He not only says that he is the maker of all things, but that he certainly also makes them by the great abundance of his power, for all things hang upon his voice, as it were. For this expression "who calls into existence the things that do not exist" does not differ from the account of blessed Moses, who says, "And God said, 'Let there be light' and there was light … 'Let there be a firmament' and there was a firmament."

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.3

• Hebrews 1:3

  "Who, being the radiance of glory and the exact representation of his substance." Quite appropriately he does not say "God" but "glory." In this way he does not allow us to meddle in the things of that nature when we are thunderstruck by his name, since of course the only "glory" worth mentioning is God's nature. Paul uses the analogy of "radiance" for that which he deemed most essential, and by the next phrase he explicates the point of the analogy. For he says that Christ preserves an accurate representation of God's nature, so that whatever you would think God's nature to be, so you must also think Christ's nature to be, inasmuch as Christ's nature bears the accurate representation of God's nature since Christ's nature does not differ from God's in the least.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.2-3

• Hebrews 1:3

  Indeed, there is a great deal of similarity [between the opening of John's Gospel and] the apostle's statement. After Paul calls him "the brightness of his glory," he adds, "the very stamp of his nature." With great care he turns from a statement of their distinction to an indication of their perfect likeness.

  COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1

• Hebrews 1:3

  He is the "Father of glory" in that Paul is accustomed to use the word glory to refer to the divine nature, because it is glorious and marvelous. So in Hebrews he says the Son is the "brightness of his glory." Instead of this he might have said "God" or "divine nature."

  COMMENTARY ON EPHESIANS 1.16

• Hebrews 1:7-8

  The mention of the angels' "service" (wind) shows their quickness, while the mention of "ministry" (flames) shows their power. When he says that the angels have been made these things, he presents how they also have the ability to be these things. And he distinguishes them from the "Creator" and "God" and "throne" and "scepter of the kingdom," all of which are symbols of his highest honor and worthiness. For also the phrase God reveals his highest nature, and throne and scepter set forth the certainty of this apart from human honors and worthiness. Then also the phrase "forever and ever" proves this, for the word Creator shows those things that have come into existence have their beginning in time, but this passage demonstrates the eternity of his kingdom.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.7-8

• Hebrews 1:12

  It is possible to see in a glance that whenever the Old Testament speaks about the divine nature, it does not speak distinctly about the Father alone, as the heretics suppose when they attempt to apply "I am God and there is no other besides me" and similar passages to the Father alone. On the contrary, whatever it says concerning God as it expounds upon the divine nature, it says in such a way that those attributes may be joined together with the Son and the Holy Spirit, owing to the fellowship of their nature. Otherwise how has the apostle dragged in this second scriptural witness from it?… Has not Paul done the same in his epistle to the Romans, where he says, "For it is written, 'As I live,' says the Lord, 'every knee shall bow to me' "? For no one would find here something that would clearly distinguish between them.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.12

• Hebrews 1:14

  That the angels were "ministering spirits" he has established from previous testimony, but now he finally renews the image of their service, saying that they do everything in service for the things needful for our salvation. For it is not a small thing to know the need for the assistance of their service.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.14-2.1

• Hebrews 2:3-4

  Paul showed that there is a very great difference between the old covenant and the new covenant, since he speaks about the "word" in the first covenant, but in this covenant he speaks of "salvation." For the first covenant was only a giving of customs and observances, whereas in this covenant there is also the grace of the Spirit and release from sins and the promise of the kingdom of heaven and the promise of immortality. Therefore, he also rightly says, "such a great salvation," showing by the epithet its greatness. In the first covenant it was given "through the angels," but now "through the Lord." And since there were marvels with the former covenant, so that the new covenant might not seem inferior to the old in this respect, he well appended the statement, "while God further testified with signs and wonders and various powers," saying this so that by its increase the fullness of grace might appear beyond that of the law also in this matter. For there the wonders took place only according to the need, but here also many of those outside the faith were healed through us, from even whatsoever diseases happened to afflict them. For such was the abundance of healings among us. Also the dead were raised.… After comparing and contrasting the difference and showing the superiority in a various and manifold manner, he added a greater thing that did not happen to those in the law: "and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed." For that each of the believers should have their own share in the Spirit was a characteristic of those in grace. And well he adds in addition to all these things "according to his own will," that is, the will of God who fully wished once and for all to lavish us greatly so that his grace for us might not be repented of, and that the gifts of grace once given to us might not be changed along with the things of the previous covenant, as some might suspect.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 2.3-4

• Hebrews 2:9

  Some suffer something very laughable here, changing "without God" and making it to read "by the grace of God," not following the Scripture's train of thought. Owing to their failure to understand that he once said, "without God," they erase it to no profit and put in what seems satisfactory to their opinion. Yet what notion would be suggested by Paul inserting "by the grace of God"? And what train of thought would lead him to this? For it is not his custom to append "by the grace of God" capriciously, but always there is some logical train of thought involved. For example, he talks about grace when he, talking about his experience, adds, "by the grace of God I am what I am." Or when it is his task to speak concerning God's love for humankind and that God has done all things, even though we are not worthy to obtain them, as is contained in his statement, "By grace you have been saved," … he appends, "And this not of your own doing, it is the gift of God, not because of works, lest any one should boast." Clearly he shows through this, that he is speaking concerning the grace of God, which he showed on behalf of all people. But in Hebrews Paul is discussing what is being set forth by him concerning Christ, what sort of person he is and how he differs from the angels (the starting point of his discussion), and in what respect he seems to be lower than them because of his death. What need was there then for him to say, "by the grace of God"? It is out of place for him to speak concerning his goodness concerning us.Instead, the line of argument shows this to be the case when he says, "without God he tasted death," since his divinity was not hindered in this respect, and therefore he showed a diminution "for a short time" from his usual state. He appears also here to share the honor because of his connection with the other nature. It is most natural that those who have heard these things would think that the indwelling of the Word of God would be spectacular at the time of his suffering, even though this does not correspond with the things that have been set forth. Yet "without" God he tasted the trial of death, he adds, "For it was fitting for him, on whose account all things exist and through whom all things exist, having led many sons into glory while he was the originator of their salvation to be made perfect through suffering." It is not that his divinity was not a contributor, he says. For the usual things "were fitting." … For, let me tell you, the fact of suffering in no way was appropriate for it. But clearly this "it was fitting" confirms the notion of "without God." For although it was not fitting, Paul himself says that it is fitting, showing at the same time also what sort of things he once did, and what they were. "For it was fitting for him, because of whom and through whom all things exist." Quite clearly he is speaking about the divine Word, inasmuch as he shared with many his sonship and led them into this glory. He is the "originator" of everybody's "salvation," our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the one who is said flatly to have been accepted as a perfect man through his sufferings, so that also Christ's nature and God's grace might be made manifest.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 2.9-10

• Hebrews 2:9

  In this account of the sonship, the apostle appears to include the man who was assumed with the "many," not because, like them, he received the sonship by grace, since the Godhead alone possesses the sonship by nature.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 12.2

• Hebrews 2:9

  Jesus is a man. For "what is man that you are mindful of him?" Yet the apostle asserts that this passage refers to Jesus, for he says, "We see him who was made a little lower than the angels, Jesus." What then do we conclude? The man Jesus was like all humans and differed in no way from those whose nature he shares, save that to him a grace was given. The grace that was given does not change his nature. But after death was destroyed, "God gave him the name which is above every name." The one who gave is God. The one to whom it was given is the man Jesus Christ, the first fruits of those who are raised. For he is the "firstborn from the dead." Therefore, he ascended and sits at the right hand of the Father and is above all.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 2

• Hebrews 2:10

  And the pioneer of all men's salvation, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the man assumed by him, is declared perfect through sufferings in such a way that both his own nature and God's grace are made evident.

  COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 2.9-10

• Hebrews 2:13

  He [Christ] has given us in holy baptism regeneration, and by this he makes us his own body, his own flesh, his offspring—as it is written, "Here am I, and the children God has given me."

  CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 16.25

• Hebrews 3:1

  But once for all heavenly things were made accessible to humans, when one of us humans was assumed and, according to the law of human nature, died and was raised from the dead in a marvelous fashion and, because immortal and incorruptible by nature, ascended into heaven. And he became high priest for the rest of humankind and the pledge for their ascension into heaven.

  CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 12.4

• Hebrews 3:1

  Because it is also the work of a high priest to enter God's presence first and then to bring the others close to him, he [Paul] quite rightly calls him high priest, because he did this in fact. Blessed Paul calls him this because by the resurrection of the dead he ascended into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God, and by these events he gave us, too, closeness to God and participation in the good things.

  CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 15.16

• Hebrews 3:12-14

  This word comes to ones who have already come to faith, as I understand it. So that it is fitting for you to praise the same things so that you might remain in the same opinions once and for all. This then Paul says, because those who believe and who have received the Spirit "share" in the substance of Christ, since they have received some physical fellowship with him. Then finally it remains to guard thoroughly this beginning with an uncontaminated mind.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 3.12-14

• Hebrews 3:14

  He says that those who have believed and shared in the Spirit have become partakers in Christ's "hypostasis" in that they have received a certain natural communion with him. Now there remains the task of preserving this foundation with a pure resolve.

  COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 3.12-13

• Hebrews 3:16-18

  He wishes to show that all who went out through Moses perished because of their unbelief, so that these might fear all the more since they were in a similar situation to those against whom he was making the argument.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 3.16-18

• Hebrews 4:1-2

  We ought to be afraid … lest we, too, who have received the promise of the entrance into the rest, may be found lacking through a wickedness of purpose. For let no one think that the promise of things to come suffices him any more than it did them. Indeed, they did not understand in faith what had been promised.

  COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 4.1-2

• Hebrews 4:1-2

  It was fitting for them to be afraid, he says so that they might not be found lacking because of the depravity of their opinion, when they themselves had received the promise of access into the rest. For let no one suppose that the promise of the things to come are sufficient for him, just as it was not sufficient for them. For they were not joined to the things promised in accordance with faith. Therefore, one ought to read as follows, "They did not attach themselves in faith to the things that they heard," namely, the promises that were made to them from God through Moses.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.1-2

• Hebrews 4:4-7

  This is the work of true "rest," namely, not having to run again to the old things, while enduring transition and change. For just as God is said to rest from his creation of the world, having completed its foundation, so it is fitting that also the one who has entered "into rest" not run back again to the old things, viewing with contempt the labors required by the law's virtuous ordinances to restrain transgression. For out of necessity change and a removal from the old institution follows these things.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.4-7

• Hebrews 4:7

  "Today" is neither an indefinite period of time, nor can it be predicated of an interval outside of "days" as if "today" were joined with each day. This should be stated not only for the sake of apostolic perspicuity but also for the sake of those who wish to understand, in the matter of the origin of the Only Begotten, the "I have begotten you today" by flatly asserting that the "today" is an indefinite period of time. They cannot perceive that if this were the case one would not be able to speak of a "today" since there was then not yet a day. The apostle has made clear that he would not say that "today" is an indefinite period of time when he said, "Again speaking in David he marks off a day." Also in another passage, "Comfort them every day until it will be called 'the Day.' " First he showed that the "today" is not being spoken of outside of "days," by his saying "every day," and so appending "until it will be called 'the Day.' " Then in the matter of the "day" it does not appear as if he were talking about an indefinite period of time which might be applied both to the time that has already passed and the time that is about to come. For what does he say? Deeming "each day" to be "the Day" which is spoken to we should give heed to remaining in the faith. For as "the Day" indicates the present day, he advises them to make full use of the day for that which is useful for exhortation.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.4-7

• Hebrews 5:7

  Even if he [the Word] gave a certain exceptional cooperation to the one who was assumed, this does not mean that the divinity took the place of the mind. If the divinity did take the place of his mind in the assumed man, as you say, how is it that he felt fear in his passion? Why did he need strong prayers in the face of necessity, the strong prayers that he offered to God with a loud voice and many tears, according to blessed Paul?

  TREATISES AGAINST APOLLINARIS 3.4

• Hebrews 6:18

  "Through two unchangeable things," namely, that God would never be able to lie about what had been promised and that he made the promise with an oath.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 6.18

• Hebrews 6:20

  Paul added that "Christ" has become "an eternal high priest" for us, in that Christ leads all those believing through him in each generation to God based on the hope of the resurrection.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 6.20

• Hebrews 7:3

  When Paul wished to show that Christ was a high priest after the order of Melchizedek, he speaks those things that pertain to him, not explaining his nature but putting forth the explanation about him found in the divine Scripture and demonstrating the similarity between Melchizedek and Christ from the Scripture.Thus, he calls him "fatherless" and "motherless," on the grounds that the divine Scripture does not narrate his genealogy. Then he adds, "being without genealogy," showing that he is not talking about the nature of the man but rather the account of the divine Scripture. Then he further connects in the thought "neither having a beginning of days nor an end of life"—not in his nature but in the divine Scripture. And since it was possible to also say these about another person—for the divine Scripture does not remember to note the parents of many people or to set forth their genealogy, especially as many as we have learned were born outside the Israelite race—he does well to add, "being likened to the Son of God, he remains a priest forever." For no longer does this apply to the rest as it does to him. And he makes clear from this explanation of the Scripture how Christ has this property as well as the rest. For Christ was "without father" in the begetting of his humanity, and "without mother" in the origin of his divine essence, and really "without genealogy." For what genealogy would there be of him who exists from his Father alone? And it is also clear that "he has neither beginning of days nor an end of life." In the case of Christ it is actually the case, whereas in the case of Melchizedek it is what we find (or do not find) in the Scripture's account of him. Christ received his "priesthood forever" from the divine Scripture where it said, "You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek," even as Melchizedek acts as priest eternally. And he calls him an "eternal" priest on the grounds that he has not passed on the priesthood to successors, which happened to be the case under Mosaic law. Therefore he also said, "Having been likened to the Son of God," and yet it was appropriate to say that the Son had been made like Melchizedek—for the first is not made like the second. Yet the truth took place in connection with Christ, but no such thing took place beforehand with Melchizedek. So he says that Melchizedek was made like Christ by the way that he appears in the narrative, since the divine Scripture wished to show to us in its narration of the life of Melchizedek the similarity with the one who was to be.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.3

• Hebrews 7:3

  God the Word was not generated from a woman; the one generated from a woman was the one fashioned in her by the power of the Holy Spirit. The one who is of one essence with the Father was not born from her womb, for he is "without mother," as blessed Paul's phrase has it. It was rather the one fashioned in his mother's womb by the power of the Holy Spirit who came in the last times. For this reason he is also called "without father."

  TREATISES AGAINST APOLLINARIS 3.1

• Hebrews 7:20-22

  He says that it shows the difference between Christ and Aaron in that Christ received the priesthood with an oath. For those who became priests without oaths became so because of their need to cease being priests at some time, but Christ entered the priesthood with oaths, since he intended to remain based on his rank. He shows his rank is far greater than those under the law, since he intended also to furnish a greater high priest to those coming to him. For in this way he says he becomes "a surety" … for being the first to rise, just as he also calls him a "high priest," so he pledges to us a similar resurrection.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.20-22

• Hebrews 9:1-2

  He begins to say how there were symbols in the law and the types of things in the era of grace and how it was possible to see clearly the things of the new covenant glimpsed beforehand in the things of the old covenant, even as he shows in comparison what sort of preeminence the new covenant things have over those of the old covenant. He makes this the beginning of the exposition of his teaching. Then he says that also the first testament had bounds and commandments of ritual that were obligated to be offered to God. The phrase "regulations for worship" refers to the commandments concerning these things."And an earthly sanctuary." Most likely he calls the temple "the sanctuary" because the liturgy is rendered in it to God, or also he calls the tabernacle "the sanctuary," since they had this in service before the temple. For in a similar manner he called the tabernacle "the temple," inasmuch as God happened to be present in it, while the later temple was built by Solomon. "And Samuel sat in the temple of the Lord where the ark of God was," although the temple had not yet been built by Solomon. And just as when God commanded Moses to erect the tabernacle as a symbol of the world according to a certain plan, God ordered him to make an enclosure out of curtains that would divide the middle from the rest, so also the temple was made according to the same plan.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 9.1-2

• Hebrews 9:27-28

  Christ having now been seen when he gained mastery over sin, took on death that had power because of sin. When sin had been atoned for, as was reasonable, he also will appear apart from suffering. For "without sin" means that when sin no longer has power, so also he himself will be seen apart from all human suffering.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 9.28

• Hebrews 10:5

  These things have been spoken to those in Babylon who wanted to say to God, "You did not demand sacrifices from me but only to obey you and to do your will." And right away the things pertaining to the quotation have become unambiguous as far as I am concerned. Changing it he speaks in this way about the person of Christ, saying, "I will establish a body" instead of "I will establish ears."

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 10.5

• Hebrews 10:26-27

  Those who have changed from the better to the worse must in the end be handed over to punishment, when they rise from the dead, since they did not allow any repentance in this life. For not merely in the present life does such an individual abolish repentance, but by his inability to assent to repentance he remains content with his fall and takes no notice of his stumbling, accomplishing every sort of sin with much pleasure by a certain lack of reason.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 10.26-27

• Hebrews 11:1-2

  He has made use of many proofs, since he knew the Jews especially questioned faith by means of a certain line of argument. For the Jews were setting forth the law and righteousness by their works, but Christians set forth faith, saying that even if someone should be guilty of ten thousand evils, by only believing in Christ he receives immediately deliverance from all of them, being deemed worthy of justification from him. Therefore, having determined this, then partly to appropriate the things that had been said before and partly to be able to show that faith appeared among all the virtuous men of old, he adds, "by faith the men of old received divine approval."

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.1-2

• Hebrews 11:19

  He obtained it in accordance with his faith. For believing in the resurrection, he received him who had died symbolically. For the fact that he suffered nothing, although he fully expected to die, was a symbol of the one who would truly rise, inasmuch as, "having tasted death for a short time," he rose, having suffered nothing under death's power. For this was done "in a parable" instead of in symbols.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19

• Hebrews 11:39-40

  It is also clear from the passage that when he says, "the dead in Christ will rise first," he does not mean to neglect the just who died before Christ's coming. Otherwise, how could he explicitly say in the epistle to the Hebrews, "And all these, though well attested by their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had foreseen something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect."

  COMMENTARY ON 1 THESSALONIANS 4:16-17

• Hebrews 12:1

  He did not simply say that there is one time of repayment for all—for this was not his intention—but he said this to show that also those who had done such things and suffered such things through faith might still await the payment of the things promised. Not bearing it with ill grace, they are brought with us of the later generation. Thus he showed their even greater endurance, if indeed they still await after death those who ought to contend likewise with them so that with them we may obtain the enjoyment of all the good. And therefore he speaks of "witnesses," not of the things suffered but of the things testified for our faith.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.1

• Hebrews 12:12-13

  Where are those who say that the apostle in this epistle precludes repentance by saying, "It is impossible to renew again thereafter to repentance those once enlightened"? How then do they understand these words: "Therefore lift your drooping hands and strengthen your weak knees"? What sort of healing of the lame does this apostle, who allegedly does not believe in a repentance for those who have sinned, wish to take place? It is clear he writes these things to believers in that he says to them: "Recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings."

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.12-13

• Hebrews 12:16-17

  Through these words he does not wish to preclude the chance of repentance, but to teach that it is not possible for those who do not receive correction at the present time to receive it later.… For he has not been eager to say contradictory things, especially in so close proximity. And anyone could figure this out from the example that he uses. For first he made mention of Esau, who partly was disheartened when he did not obtain the blessing, but partly abided the decision even after this event owing to the malice of his character. Then when he repented of his assent to sin, he did not obtain the blessing. For he was not asking for repentance, but for the blessing that had been given to his brother in accordance with the worthiness of his character. It was impossible that the blessing would again be taken away and given to him again. Also, however, it is possible to discover that his tears were not altogether unprofitable. His father seems to have grieved thereafter for his careless son and seems to have given him some blessings. So he does not wish to preclude repentance through these words.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.17

• Hebrews 12:26-27

  Based on the voice of the prophet he proves both the change from the things that now exist and the establishment of the things that follow. For the promise "to shake" makes clear that they will change altogether in the future. By the addition of the word "once and for all" he shows clearly that thereafter they will be unchangeable.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.26

• Hebrews 12:26-27

  Quite rightly on the basis of the prophetic verse does he establish the instability of the present order and the steadfastness of the things which shall be later. For the "shaking" shows that he is proclaiming the alteration of the present order exactly as it will be. And by adding the word once he shows that what will be afterwards cannot be changed.

  COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 12.26

• Hebrews 12:28-29

  The apostle did not think it possible to describe God's judgment sufficiently in any other way than through an analogy from our experience, and for this reason he did not hesitate to call God "fire."

  COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1

• Hebrews 13:7

  "The leaders" are those who have proclaimed the word of godliness among them and were killed by the Jews on the spot. And there were many, not only Stephen and James who was killed by the sword, but also James, brother of our Lord, and very many others handed over in silence.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13.7

• Hebrews 13:15-16

  He calls it "doing good" in order to praise what takes place and "fellowship" because they are concerned about their fellow believers … and so with zeal they seek to meet their needs.

  FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13.16